Differences in composition of territories in relation to behaviour, stage, and depth of the three-spot damselfish, Stegastes planifrons, in Caribbean coral reefs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coral reef diversity is correlated with the depth at which the reefs are found, the energy available for biological processes, and the species’ roles and presence throughout the food chain. Can a specific species activity alter the whole ecosystem? Can a small-scale, short-term activity such as fish behaviour have a long-term effect on a larger scale, that of the reef? Can the life stage of a species mediate substrate competition? The three-spot damselfish (Stegastes planifrons) is hypothesized to regulate competition between substrate coverage by actively farming – protecting from herbivores and weeding – in order to regulate the algal species composition and percent coverage of the reef. This behaviour is observed in both juvenile and adult fish. Deeper patches are predicted to have less coral diversity and higher algal diversity; juvenile fish are predicted to have less diversity in their patches than adults. Coral and algal diversity are hypothesized to be negatively correlated. In this study, behaviour of the S. planifrons was classified into one of four categories (active patrolling, passing patrolling, farming, and hiding) and palatable algae surface area coverage was digitized from photographs; life stage was either juvenile or adult. Coral and algal genus diversity were measured along a depth gradient of 0-16 m where the diversity of the reef was thought to be the highest. A three-way ANCOVA was performed to test whether fish behaviour (a small-scale, short-term process), depth, or fish development stage (juvenile or adult) had a significant effect on coral or algal diversity (a large-scale, long-term process). Results showed a significant effect of fish behaviour category on algal genera diversity, and a significant effect of depth on both algal and coral genera diversity. Farming yielded significantly more algal coverage than hiding. This study shows that small-scale, short-term behaviours by S. planifrons can have an effect on algal genera diversity on coral reefs in Utila, Honduras.
 
 Keywords: Stegastes planifrons (three-spotted damselfish); behaviours (short-term, small-scale); stage of development (juvenile, adult); depth; coral reef and algal diversity (long-term, large-scale); damselfish territories
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".