MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1954157152 · doi:10.1002/047084289x.rt175

Tri-<i>n</i>-butylstannylcopper

2001· reference-entry· en· W1954157152 on OpenAlexaff
Edward Piers, Christine Rogers

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis · 2001
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Compounds Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReagentIodideChemistryDimethyl sulfideBromideInert gasElectrophileSolventCopperSolubilitySulfideInorganic chemistryMedicinal chemistryNuclear chemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysisSulfur

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[82097-93-6] C12H27CuSn (MW 353.65) InChI = 1S/3C4H9.Cu.Sn/c3*1-3-4-2;;/h3*1,3-4H2,2H3;; InChIKey = BQXNARKRLDXPOX-UHFFFAOYSA-N (incorporation of tributyltin via reaction with electrophilic substrates1-6) Physical Data: prepared in situ; its THF solution is dark red. Solubility: sol THF. Preparative Methods: Bu3SnCu 1 is prepared by reaction of Tri-n-butylstannyllithium with 1 equiv of Copper(I) Iodide (eq 1).1, 2, 5, 8 A closely related reagent, Bu3SnCuċMe2S (see Trimethylstannylcopper–Dimethyl Sulfide), is readily obtained by treatment of Bu3SnLi with an equimolar quantity of CuBrċMe2S 2 (see Copper(I) Bromide) (eq 2).3, 4, 9-13 (1) (2) Handling, Storage, and Precautions: should be prepared in dry solvent and used under an inert atmosphere. Organotin compounds are toxic;7 therefore, reaction workup should be carried out in a fume hood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.040

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncyclopedia of Reagents for Organic SynthesisSame topicOrganometallic Compounds Synthesis and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207