Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis bientôt une trentaine d’années, la littérature sur la communication des territoires s’est largement répandue, en particulier dans la recherche francophone. Pour autant, la « communication territoriale » reste profondément marquée par une sorte de dispersion (conceptuelle, géographique, etc.), ainsi que par une faible stabilisation théorique. Comment expliquer un tel contraste, à l’heure où de nouvelles préoccupations (citoyenneté, réseaux, crises identitaires…) interpellent la ville et l’espace local et, avec eux, la communication en tant que domaine de production de la théorie et des modes d’intervention publique ? À partir d’une étude sociohistorique, l’article revisite les processus de sédimentation de ce champ (la communication territoriale), tout en esquissant des explications de sa « crise de croissance » théorique. Une synthèse des perspectives de renouvellement théorique est également proposée, à la lumière de quelques récents travaux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.023 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".