Achieving Competitive Advantage in Economic Crisis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper seeks to encourage potential and existing entrepreneurs to do business, even in economic crisis and global recession. The global economic crisis strongly affected less developed areas, especially small entrepreneurs in these areas. In such conditions there is not much space left for successful entrepreneurship, entrepreneurs are forced to search new opportunities, and to do businesses with higher risks. They must have a modern approach to entrepreneurship, which tries to discover new opportunities in an innovative way. The paper shows that crisis and recession can provide new opportunities that need to be detected at the right time Competitive advantage may be gained if the entrepreneur is able to offer something valuable and important to the market, and if it differs from the competition in a way that offers better quality. In addition, there must be many other sources of competitive advantages which should support the main source of competitive value. The aim of the paper is to help entrepreneurs to find sources of competitive advantage in time of economic crises.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it