Preliminary Evaluation of Ground Motions from Earthquakes in Alberta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Article| June 10, 2015 Preliminary Evaluation of Ground Motions from Earthquakes in Alberta Mark Novakovic; Mark Novakovic Department of Earth Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 2V4mnovako3@uwo.cagmatkinson@aol.com Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Gail M. Atkinson Gail M. Atkinson Department of Earth Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 2V4mnovako3@uwo.cagmatkinson@aol.com Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Mark Novakovic Department of Earth Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 2V4mnovako3@uwo.cagmatkinson@aol.com Gail M. Atkinson Department of Earth Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 2V4mnovako3@uwo.cagmatkinson@aol.com Publisher: Seismological Society of America First Online: 14 Jul 2017 Online Issn: 1938-2057 Print Issn: 0895-0695 © 2015 by the Seismological Society of America Seismological Research Letters (2015) 86 (4): 1086–1095. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220150059 Article history First Online: 14 Jul 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Mark Novakovic, Gail M. Atkinson; Preliminary Evaluation of Ground Motions from Earthquakes in Alberta. Seismological Research Letters 2015;; 86 (4): 1086–1095. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220150059 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietySeismological Research Letters Search Advanced Search Between 9 September 2013 and 22 January 2015, more than 900 seismic events in local magnitude (ML) range 1–4 were detected and located in near‐real time by the new TransAlta/Nanometrics network in western Alberta, which commenced operation in the fall of 2013. The network comprises 27 three‐component broadband seismograph stations, located as shown in Figure 1, which act in cooperation with other real‐time seismograph stations operated by the Alberta Geological Survey (AGS) (Stern et al., 2011) and the Geological Survey of Canada (GSC). There are additional campaign‐mode stations in the Canadian Rockies and... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".