Meteorological phenomena associated with wind-power ramps downwind of mountainous terrain
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wind-power ramps are a significant source of uncertainty in wind-energy forecasting and are a challenge to electric-grid stability. In the Canadian province of Alberta, strong westerly winds buffet the Rocky Mountains creating an abundant yet intermittent wind energy resource in the plains of Alberta. In the current study, wind-power ramp events have been detected and correlated to several environmental factors including time-of-day, atmospheric stability, season and a Föhn wind event known locally as a Chinook wind at a field wind measurement station downstream of the Rocky Mountains. Large wind-power ramps (a 50% change in power in less than 4 h) were found to occur on days when a Föhn wind was present over 50% of the time. The result highlights the importance of this meteorological phenomenon to wind energy production locally and also in regions where Föhn winds occur. The detected wind-power ramps were found to vary significantly with season, with the strongest wind-power ramps emanating from the Rocky Mountains in the winter months under stable atmospheric conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it