MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1955905427

Tolstoi, Unamuno y el existencialismo cristiano

2003· article· es· W1955905427 on OpenAlexaff
Anna Hamling

Bibliographic record

VenueGredos (University of Salamanca) · 2003
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish Philosophy and Literature
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExistentialismPhilosophyReading (process)LiteratureEpistemologyLinguisticsArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[ES] Las obras de Tolstoi y de Unamuno han sido estudiadas, conocidas y estimadas en el ámbito de la literatura mundial tanto por el público como por los criticos literarios. Los dos grandes escritores de las letras universales son agitadores de espíritus y apóstoles de un cristianismo renovado; los dos convergen en el concepto de la fe viva, estimulada por la duda y apoyada en el amor a Dios a través de Jesucristo. En el presente estudio se analizan algunas analogías y convergencias en cuanto al existencialismo cristiano en el pensamiento religioso de ambos escritores a través de una selección de los ensayos de tema religioso.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.018
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGredos (University of Salamanca)Same topicSpanish Philosophy and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207