MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Explorando a aprendizagem independente integrada e a inovação nos programas de pós-graduação brasileiros

2013· article· pt· W1955939153 on OpenAlexaff
Ronaldo Mota

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação · 2013
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Digital Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo apresenta observações sobre aprendizagem independente integrada, com ênfase no papel do professor, acompanhando as experiências de aprendizagem dos estudantes, e tendo os estudantes compartilhando com o professor a centralidade do processo ensino-aprendizagem. Essa estratégia de ensino, aplicável a qualquer nível educacional, inclusive aos cursos de pósgraduação, é apresentada como poderoso instrumento motivador para contribuir com a formação de profissionais capazes de enfrentar os desafios associados com o novo cenário brasileiro, em que inovação e empreendedorismo são prioridades centrais.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Brasileira de Pós-GraduaçãoSame topicEducation and Digital TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207