MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1955956474 · doi:10.24908/pceea.v0i0.4044

INNOVATIONS AND LIMITATIONS INVOLVED IN TREATING DEPLOYING MEMBRANE STRUCTURES AS UNFOLDING TREE LEAVES

2011· article· en· W1955956474 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Marie-Josée Potvin, Bruno Sylvestre, Johanne Heald

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalCanadian Space Agency
FundersCanadian Space AgencyÉcole de technologie supérieure
KeywordsCover (algebra)Tree (set theory)Space (punctuation)Agency (philosophy)Electronic circuitComputer scienceEngineeringNanotechnologyElectrical engineeringMaterials scienceSociologyMechanical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many structures in space must be deployed to cover a large area. They must be lightweight and packaged as efficiently as possible to reduce their launch cost. Nature offers interesting ideas in the way it packages tree leaves and then deploys them in a flat structure. Several authors have looked at these concepts, but no research has been undertaken to take into account the effect of electrical circuits on a membrane. This paper looks at which ideas can be used for the two applications of interest to the Canadian Space Agency, namely, membrane solar panels and membrane SAR antennae.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)Same topicStructural Analysis and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207