Le profil d'apprentissage des étudiants inscrits dans un certificat de cycle offert à distance et sur campus: Une étude comparative
Bibliographic record
Abstract
n Quebec, there are two types of higher education offered to adults: conventional education and distance education. This research has attempted to answer the following question: Is there a difference as to the individual characteristics of students registered in an on-campus program and students in an off-campus program? Four hypotheses have been formulated and a set of questionnaires of learning profile were carried out by 335 students in human sciences. The results show that there is indeed a significant difference in study motives, learning styles, cognitive styles, and locus of control. Au Quebec, deux types d'enseignement universitaire sont offerts aux adultes : l'enseignement traditionnel et la formation a distance. La recherche en cours a tente de repondre a la question suivante: « Existe-t-il une difference entre les caracteristiques individuelles des etudiants admis dans un programme offert sur campus et ceux admis dans un programme offert a distance? » Quatre hypotheses ont ete formulees et des questionnaires sur le profil d'apprentissage ont ete remplis par 335 etudiants en sciences humaines. Les resultats demontrent qu'il existe effectivement une difference significative au plan des motifs d'etudes, du style d'apprentissage, du style cognitif et du lieu de controle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".