MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1956439169 · doi:10.3233/ifs-151936

A fast Algorithm for mining fuzzy frequent itemsets

2015· article· en· W1956439169 on OpenAlexaff
Jerry Chun‐Wei Lin, Ting Li, Philippe Fournier‐Viger, Tzung‐Pei Hong

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
FundersHarbin Institute of TechnologyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaTencent
KeywordsTree traversalData miningComputer sciencePruningApriori algorithmFuzzy logicSet (abstract data type)Process (computing)Tree (set theory)Fuzzy setA priori and a posterioriAlgorithmAssociation rule learningArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a fuzzy frequent itemset (FFI)-Miner algorithm is developed to mine the complete set of FFIs without candidate generation. It uses a novel fuzzy-list structure to keep the essential information for later mining process. An efficient pruning strategy is also developed to reduce the search space, thus speeding up the mining process to directly discover the FFIs. Experiments are conducted to show the performance of the proposed FFI-Miner algorithm compared to the Apriori-based and tree-based approaches in terms of execution time and the number of traversal nodes for discovering FFIs under variants of membership functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Intelligent & Fuzzy SystemsSame topicData Mining Algorithms and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207