MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1956602043 · doi:10.1109/cds.1998.675769

Dynamic service reconfiguration and migration in the Kea kernel

2002· article· en· W1956602043 on OpenAlexaff
Alistair Veitch, N.C. Hutchinson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed systems and fault tolerance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceControl reconfigurationKernel (algebra)ReconfigurabilityDomain (mathematical analysis)Distributed computingService (business)DebuggingStructuringModular designHierarchyLayeringSoftware engineeringOperating systemEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kea is a new operating system developed for experimentation with kernel structuring, configuration and specialization. There are several features of Kea's design that make the investigation of these issues practical. Firstly it supports fine-grain decomposition of kernel services, the components of which communicate using inter-domain calls. This communication mechanism forms the backbone of Kea's reconfigurability, as services can be located in separate domains, for development or debugging purposes, and then dynamically migrated into a common domain, or into the kernel itself, transparently to the users of the service. The inter-domain calls are automatically optimized to procedure calls as appropriate. The service hierarchy can also be dynamically reconfigured through replacement, or the layering of new services, either on a system wide or application specific basis. We describe these features, and discuss the results from several experiments that demonstrate the practicality and performance advantages of Kea's design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDistributed systems and fault toleranceFrench-language works237,207