Représentation politique et enjeux identitaires chez des acteurs politiques issus de l'immigration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le monde politique quebecois, certaines communautes ethnoculturelles sont peu representees. Ce deficit de representation politique des communautes ethnoculturelles minoritaires est porteur pour ces dernieres d’enjeux sociaux, mais egalement identitaires. En plus de leur mandat de representant de l’ensemble de leurs commettants, les personnalites politiques issues de ces groupes peuvent avoir des preoccupations d’ordre communautaire. La perception de leur role d’acteur politique par des personnalites politiques issues de la communaute haitienne indique le deploiement de strategies visant la satisfaction de besoins identitaires. The diversity of the Quebec population is not fully reflected in its political environment. This lack of political representation of ethnic minorities’ communities carries many social as well as identity issues. In addition to their mandate to represent all of their constituents, politicians from ethnocultural minority groups may have concerns about policies regarding their own communities. The perception of some Haitian politicians concerning their role in politics reveals the use of strategies to satisfy identity needs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".