MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1956926196

OGC Sensor Web Enablement compliance for Ocean Networks Canada scalar data

2013· article· en· W1956926196 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venue2013 OCEANS - San Diego · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Computational Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsOcean Networks Canada Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUSableWorld Wide WebSensor webMiddleware (distributed applications)Computer scienceWeb serviceWeb Coverage ServiceData as a serviceService (business)BusinessDatabaseWeb mappingTelecommunicationsWeb standards
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Digital Infrastructure group at Ocean Networks Canada (ONC) is in charge of the development and maintenance of the Organization's Data Management and Archiving System (DMAS), also referred to as “Oceans 2.0”. The group has been successful in setting up a software system that acquires data from large sensor networks, archives them and makes them available to a varied audience of scientists, the public as wells as government and non-governmental agencies. Oceans 2.0 relies on its Service-Oriented Architecture to acquire data and has extended it to support data distribution to a wider range of customers using web services. More recently following a funding opportunity with CANARIE Inc. to deliver portable, re-usable middleware, OGC SWE-compliant web services were implemented. The new services offer the ability to OGC-ready clients to obtain ONC scalar data in a self-descriptive and effective way.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it