MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1957449701 · doi:10.1109/apmc.2001.985376

Highly accurate harmonic tuners for load pull testing

2002· article· en· W1957449701 on OpenAlexaff
C. Tsironis, A. Jurenas, Congrui Liu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsFocus Microwaves (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmith chartLoad pullHarmonicNonlinear systemHarmonic analysisElectrical impedanceCalibrationElectronic engineeringInterpolation (computer graphics)ReflectometryMicrowaveComputer scienceVoltageAcousticsControl theory (sociology)Electrical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringTransistorImpedance matchingTime domainTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Highly reflective harmonic tuners with high resolution tuning accuracy between 0.2/spl deg/ and 0.7/spl deg/ over the whole 0-360/spl deg/ interpolated tuning range are presented. This can be obtained through precise alignment supported by calibration and nonlinear interpolation algorithms that allow reproduction of arbitrary impedances with accuracy typically exceeding -50dB, at the very edge of the Smith Chart. These tuners are used in a compact and accurate harmonic load pull system. This allows characterization of complex and strongly nonlinear behavior of microwave transistors, including: hot IV curves, saturation plots and load pull contours all under controlled conditions of the 2nd and 3rd harmonic impedances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207