Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les ventes québécoises d’électricité par Hydro-Québec ont augmenté au rythme annuel de 3,8 % de 1980 à 1990 même si la croissance fut nulle au cours des trois premières années. La société d’État est plutôt pessimiste quant aux perspectives de croissance de sa demande et elle prévoit une hausse annuelle de 2,2 % de 1990 à 2006. Lorsque nous considérons les facteurs de base sous-jacents à la demande d’électricité et leur évolution attendue, à savoir le changement démographique, la croissance économique, la stucture de l’économie et les prix des différentes sources d’énergie, il est difficile de partager le pessimiste manifesté par Hydro-Québec. Il demeure qu’il existe certains marchés, comme le chauffage résidentiel qui ne sont pas rentables ni pour Hydro-Québec ni pour la société en général et qui pourraient être servis à des coûts moindres à partir des autres sources d’énergie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".