Evidence for alternative male morphs in a <scp>T</scp>anganyikan cichlid fish
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Teleost fish show tremendous variation in breeding systems. In particular, indeterminate growth and external fertilization create great disparities in reproductive success among males, which drive the evolution of male reproductive polymorphisms. Here, we present evidence for alternative male reproductive tactics in Neolamprologus modestus, a substrate‐spawning African cichlid fish. We observed two types of males in our study site: (1) males that guarded large territories comprised of smaller subterritories of several females and (2) males that did not hold territories and were vigorously attacked by the guarding males upon intrusion into the guarding male's territory. We hypothesized that these intruder males constitute an alternative male phenotype. To test this hypothesis, we collected both territorial males and these intruder males to determine if there were differences in overall body size, gonad size, age or hormone profiles between the two male phenotypes that would be consistent with alternative reproductive tactics in this species. We also collected guarded offspring from territorial male and female pairs to determine if there was any extra‐pair paternity in N. modestus that could indicate the possibility of alternative reproductive tactics. We found that intruder males were significantly smaller in body size and had significantly larger testes in absolute and relative mass compared with territorial paired males. While we assigned no paternity to any collected intruder males, we found that extra‐pair paternity occurred in eight of the 12 collected broods and accounted for c. 27% of all offspring across all broods. Finally, the two sets of males did not differ significantly in age or in circulating androgen levels, suggesting that individuals may not change morphs within their lifetime, but instead may adopt distinct life history strategies. Collectively, we provide strong evidence that intruder N. modestus males represent an alternative small‐bodied male morph that may practice alternative reproductive tactics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".