MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1958064606 · doi:10.1111/jzo.12222

Evidence for alternative male morphs in a <scp>T</scp>anganyikan cichlid fish

2015· article· en· W1958064606 on OpenAlexafffund
Jennifer K. Hellmann, Constance M. O’Connor, Isaac Y. Ligocki, Troy M. Farmer, Tamara Arnold, Adam R. Reddon, Kelly A. Garvy, Susan E. Marsh‐Rollo, Sigal Balshine, Ian M. Hamilton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Zoology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Behavior and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersCanada Research ChairsCanadian Society of ZoologistsOntario Innovation TrustSciFund Challenge
KeywordsBiologyCichlidOffspringReproductive successZoologyFish <Actinopterygii>EcologyDemographyPopulationFisheryGeneticsPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Teleost fish show tremendous variation in breeding systems. In particular, indeterminate growth and external fertilization create great disparities in reproductive success among males, which drive the evolution of male reproductive polymorphisms. Here, we present evidence for alternative male reproductive tactics in N eolamprologus modestus , a substrate‐spawning A frican cichlid fish. We observed two types of males in our study site: (1) males that guarded large territories comprised of smaller subterritories of several females and (2) males that did not hold territories and were vigorously attacked by the guarding males upon intrusion into the guarding male's territory. We hypothesized that these intruder males constitute an alternative male phenotype. To test this hypothesis, we collected both territorial males and these intruder males to determine if there were differences in overall body size, gonad size, age or hormone profiles between the two male phenotypes that would be consistent with alternative reproductive tactics in this species. We also collected guarded offspring from territorial male and female pairs to determine if there was any extra‐pair paternity in N . modestus that could indicate the possibility of alternative reproductive tactics. We found that intruder males were significantly smaller in body size and had significantly larger testes in absolute and relative mass compared with territorial paired males. While we assigned no paternity to any collected intruder males, we found that extra‐pair paternity occurred in eight of the 12 collected broods and accounted for c . 27% of all offspring across all broods. Finally, the two sets of males did not differ significantly in age or in circulating androgen levels, suggesting that individuals may not change morphs within their lifetime, but instead may adopt distinct life history strategies. Collectively, we provide strong evidence that intruder N . modestus males represent an alternative small‐bodied male morph that may practice alternative reproductive tactics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.342
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of ZoologySame topicAnimal Behavior and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207