MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1958320168 · doi:10.3138/topia.10.39

Ethics, Activism, and the Rise of Interdisciplinary Animal Studies: An Interview with Cary Wolfe

2003· article· en· W1958320168 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dana Medoro, Alison Calder

Bibliographic record

VenueTOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographies of human-animal interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanismAnimal ethicsHuman animalRacismAnimal rightsSociologyEnvironmental ethicsCultural studiesAnthropologyPsychoanalysisEpistemologyGender studiesPsychologyPhilosophyPolitical scienceLawEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this interview, Professor Cary Wolfe—author of the recently published Animal Rites: American Culture, the Discourse of Species, and Posthumanist Theory (2003) and editor of Zoontologies: The Question of the Animal (2003)—discusses and clarifies his approaches to the subjects of animal rights, ethics, and post-humanist theory. To better address the relationship between human and non-human animals,Wolfe insists upon a ceaseless examination of culturally encoded and oppressively maintained divisions across different species. Throughout the interview, Wolfe contends that “speciesism” should invite the same critical attention in the academy that has been recruited against sexism and racism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.706
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural StudiesSame topicGeographies of human-animal interactionsFrench-language works237,207