Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’epilepsie generalisee est souvent reliee a un profil cognitif assez sombre. De plus, des troubles mnesiques sont frequemment associes chez les patients souffrant d’epilepsie generalisee. En effet, les plaintes quant aux capacites mnesiques sont celles qui sont le plus souvent rapportees par les patients. De plus, des difficultes mnesiques, tant au niveau de la memoire a court terme que de la memoire a long terme, sont frequemment mesurees chez ces patients, que ce soit dans une population adulte ou une population pediatrique. Il existe toutefois de nombreuses contradictions dans la litterature quant aux deficits rapportes. L’objectif principal de cet article est donc de dresser les differents tableaux mnesiques rapportes chez les enfants et les adultes presentant une epilepsie generalisee. De plus, les differentes explications proposees quant a l’origine de ces troubles seront exposees. Toutefois, quelle que soit la cause des problemes de memoire, ceux-ci peuvent avoir un impact important sur la vie quotidienne ainsi que sur les activites sociales, scolaires et professionnelles. Il est donc primordial d’investiguer et de definir les troubles de memoire presentes par les patients souffrant d’epilepsie generalisee.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | medium |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".