Factors influencing the development of jugular thrombophlebitis in cattle and comparison of 2 types of catheter.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two studies were conducted to evaluate the factors associated with the development of thrombophlebitis in cattle following intravenous catheterization of the jugular vein. In study 1, 20 healthy animals were catheterized with 2 different types of catheter (polytetrafluoroethylene (PTE) versus polyvinylchloride (PVC)) for a period of 120 hours. In study 2, 50 dairy cows referred for treatment to the Large Animal Veterinary Teaching Hospital at the University of Montreal were catheterized with a commercial PTE catheter, using a standardized technique, for a period varying from 3 to 6 days, and inherent risk factors were evaluated. A clinical and echographical evaluation of the 2 groups in study 1 demonstrated a higher frequency of thrombosis in the PTE group than in the PVC group. In study 2, the primary factors associated with the development of thrombophlebitis in sick cows were the experience of the manipulator and the severity of the disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".