11- CORPOS NUS E SEMINUS NA COREOGRAFIA CONTEMPORÂNEA: INTIMIDADE E EXPOSIÇÃO EM AQUILO DE QUE SOMOS FEITOS E EM BUNDAFLOR BUNDAMOR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo propoe uma reflexao sobre a presenca do corpo nu na criacao coreografica contemporânea, tendo como referencias Aquilo de que somos feitos, da Lia Rodrigues Companhia de Dancas; e Bundaflor Bundamor, da Eduardo Severino Companhia de Danca. Utilizando a etnografia e a autoetnografia como abordagens metodologicas, ressaltam-se os aspectos relacionados a nudez, a intimidade e a exposicao a partir do ponto de vista dos interpretes e da coreografa, em Aquilo de que somos feitos, e da perspectiva da propria pesquisadora, que tambem atua como interprete em Bundaflor Bundamor. Palavras-chave | Nudez | Semi-nudez | Coreografia | Etnografia | Auto-etnografia MONICA DANTAS e Doutora em Estudos e Praticas Artisticas pela Universite du Quebec a Montreal (Canada) e Mestre em Ciencias do Movimento Humano pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Professora Adjunta da UFRGS desde 1995, nos cursos de graduacao em Educacao Fisica e em Danca e tambem professora colaboradora no Programa de Pos-Graduacao em Artes Cenicas/Mestrado do Instituto de Artes da UFRGS e integra o conselho editorial da Revista Movimento (UFRGS), da Revista Cena (UFRGS) e da Revista da Fundarte (FUNDARTE/UERGS). Bailarina com formacao em danca moderna e contemporânea, fez parte de diversos grupos e coletivos de danca em Porto Alegre. Integra o Coletivo de Artistas da Sala 209 – Projeto Usina das Artes. Em 2010 concebeu e coordenou o projeto “dar carne a memoria, celebracao do repertorio coreografico de Eva Schul”, agraciado com o Premio Funarte Klauss Vianna de Danca 2009. This study proposes a reflection on the presence of the naked body in contemporary choreography, using as examples the pieces: Aquilo de que somos feitos (What we are made of), by Lia Rodrigues Dance Company; and Bundaflor Bundamor, by Eduardo Severino Dance Company. By adopting an ethnographical and auto-ethnographical standpoint, some aspects of nakedness, intimacy and exposure are described: both from the performer’s and the choreographer’s point of view (in Aquilo de que somos feitos) and from the present researcher’s position (in Bundaflor Bundamor, in which the author also partakes as a performer). Keywords | Naked | Half-naked | Choreography | Ethnography | Auto-ethnography MONICA DANTAS earned a PhD in Etudes et pratiques des arts at the Universite du Quebec a Montreal and her M.A. in Human Movement Sciences at the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). She is an associate professor of UFRGS in Porto Alegre, Brazil, since 1995, where she teaches at the undergraduate program in Physical Education and in Dance. She is also adjunct professor at the master´s course of the postgraduate program in Performing Arts of the Arts Institute of UFRGS and a member of the editorial council of the magazines: Revista Movimento (UFRGS), Revista Cena (UFRGS) and Revista da Fundarte (FUNDARTE/UERGS). She is a dancer trained in modern and contemporary dance and has been part of various groups and dance collectives in Porto Alegre. She is a member of the artist´s collective Sala 209 – projeto Usina das Artes. In 2010 she conceived and coordinated the project “dar carne a memoria, a celebration of the choreographic repertory of Eva Schul”, which was awarded the Premio Funarte Klauss Vianna de Danca of 2009.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".