MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1959196245

Strange Attractors: Queers, Chaos, and Evolution

2015· article· en· W1959196245 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralasian Document Computing Symposium · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCritical Theory and Philosophy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueerRealmAttractorSituatedCHAOS (operating system)Chaos theoryQueer theoryPoliticsField (mathematics)SociologyEpistemologyComputer scienceMathematicsGender studiesArtificial intelligencePure mathematicsPhilosophyPolitical scienceChaoticLawMathematical analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new definition of the queer as ‘the strange attractor’ is developed using chaos theory. Queer-aschaos is situated within the broad field of systems theory as it has been developed in evolutionary biology, mathematics, ecology and social science. Queer-as-chaos is examined as a disruptive but evolutionary force that transforms cultures, social institutions, power structures and local / global systems. The concept is explored through embodiment, relationships, language, performance, aesthetics, politics, and other strains of queer theory. Finally, queer-as-chaos is mapped onto the realm of on-going political movements to discern a queer politics

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it