Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, j’examine la relation entre un conservateur de musée et un Cri des Plaines spécialiste des rituels, dans le cadre d’une recherche anthropologique portant sur des objets autochtones sacrés et cérémoniels appartenant à des collections muséales, donc à l’État. J’avance que les relations des Autochtones avec les objets sacrés et cérémoniels se situent nécessairement en-dehors des catégories de la propriété sur lesquelles se fonde l’État, et je démontre que le simple fait de mettre en doute le présupposé voulant qu’il n’y ait qu’un unique cosmos préexistant remet en question ce qui est en jeu dans les revendications de propriété. Plutôt que de se préoccuper de droits de propriété légaux, ces revendications font apparaître que ce qui constitue les relations éthiques entre les musées et les peuples autochtones dépend de la reconnaissance de l’existence de mondes différents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".