L'esplosione del diritto. Il sistema giuridico italiano dal 1975 al 2000
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The last quarter of a century has witnessed a veritable explosion of law in Italy: both the supply and the demand of justice have increased; new legal actors have appeared on the scene or seen their role strengthened; the numbers of students and graduates in law have increased; and there has been an increase in the rate of production of legal culture. The reasons for these changes are economic (industrialisation and the development of services), political (the new organisation of the legal system resulting from European integration) and social (the increase in the tendency to resort to litigation). That being said, however, these changes are accompanied by a degree of relative stability among other factors. The result is four contradictions: stability of the numbers of the magistracy vis-a-vis an increase in the number of cases heard; the continuity of the state vis-a-vis the development of local powers; the stability of the numbers of professors in legal disciplines vis-a-vis the increase in the number of law graduates; the inertia of legal stereotypes vis-a-vis modifications in legal culture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.054 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".