Bibliographic record
Abstract
<span style="font-size: 12px; font-family: Arial;">Este estudio introductorio pretende situar la representación del Islam y el espacio islámico en la España actual dentro de un contexto histórico que revela la subversión del Islam en España por gobiernos tradicionalmente católicos. A través de análisis comparativos de cómo la información sobre el Islam fue recogida, distribuida y controlada entre el siglo XVI y hoy, una organización sociopolítica emerge entre una autocracia espiritual y una moderna democracia a la luz de prácticas dictatoriales y control cultural.</span> <span style="font-family: Arial;">___________________</span> <strong><span style="font-family: Arial;">ABSTRACT:</span></strong> This introductory study attempts to situate the representation of Islam and Islamic space in modern-day Spain within an historical context that reveals the subversion of Islam in Spain by traditionally Catholic governments. Through comparative examinations of how information about Islam was collected, distributed and controlled between the 16th Century and today, an overarching socio-political organization emerges that is shared by a spiritualized autocracy and a modern democracy in light of dictatorial practices and cultural control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".