MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1959821229 · doi:10.1109/epe.2015.7309244

An FPGA-based real-time HIL test bench for full-bridge modular multilevel STATCOM controller

2015· article· en· W1959821229 on OpenAlexaff
Wei Li, Jean Bélanger

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsOpal-Rt Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModular designField-programmable gate arrayTest benchComputer scienceVoltageTransformerReal-time simulationCapacitorController (irrigation)Embedded systemElectronic engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The modular multilevel converter (MMC) STATCOM removes the need for AC filter and transformer, has no DC bus fault hazard, and thus becomes a better option than a 2-level voltage source converter (VSC) STATCOM. An MMC can have hundreds of submodules (SM). The switches in the SM are controlled individually and the capacitor voltages have to be balanced. Therefore, the control and protection system is sophisticated and has to be validated for different scenarios preferably by hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) tests. Modeling MMC in detail and simulating it in real time has two main challenges: solving the large circuit containing numerous switches and handling numerous inputs and outputs (IO) in very small time steps. This paper presents a real time test bench, which implements the detailed MMC valve models in field programmable gate array (FPGA) boards and enables connecting to external controllers through high speed protocols used by MMC manufacturers. It can simulate very large systems, e.g. multiple MMC STATCOM and high voltage direct current (HVDC) systems with up to 1000 SM per valve, at multiple sampling rates in real time: the MMC valve is simulated in FPGA with a time step of 250 ns and the rest of the power system is simulated in central processing unit (CPU) cores with a time step of tens of microseconds. The detailed MMC model in the test bench is able to accurately reproduce system behaviors in steady state, transients and faults, which facilitate HIL tests of actual MMC controller for all scenarios in a close-to-reality environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207