MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1960013666 · doi:10.1002/0471142301.ns0328s71

Tracking Neuronal Migration in Adult Brain Slices

2015· article· en· W1960013666 on OpenAlexafffund
Karen Bakhshetyan, Armen Saghatelyan

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Protocols in Neuroscience · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsNeuroscienceNeuroblastNeuronal migrationCell migrationBiologyOlfactory bulbRostral migratory streamHuman brainEmbryonic stem cellCellSubventricular zoneNeural stem cellCentral nervous systemNeurogenesisCell biologyGeneStem cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuronal migration is one of the fundamental processes underlying the proper assembly and function of neural circuitry. The majority of neuronal precursors are generated far away from their sites of integration and need to migrate substantial distances to reach their final destination. Neuronal migration occurs not only in the embryonic brain but also in a few regions of the adult brain such as the olfactory bulb (OB). The mechanisms orchestrating cell migration in the adult brain are, however, poorly understood, despite their clinical relevance. Here we describe a method for time-lapse imaging of cell migration in acute brain slices. This method, combined with genetic and/or pharmacological manipulations of different molecular pathways, makes it possible to determine the dynamics and molecular mechanisms of cell migration in the adult brain. In addition, time-lapse imaging in acute brain slices makes it possible to monitor cell movement in a microenvironment that closely resembles in vivo conditions and to study neuroblast displacement along with other cellular elements such as astrocytes and blood vessels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.205
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Protocols in NeuroscienceSame topicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsFrench-language works237,207