MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1960582794 · doi:10.32316/hse/rhe.v16i2.335

“A Real Girl and a Real Dentist”: Ontario Women Dental Graduates of the 1920s

2004· article· en· W1960582794 on OpenAlex
Tracey L. Adams

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical Studies in Education / Revue d histoire de l éducation · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHistorical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGraduation (instrument)GirlDental practiceDentistryMedicineMedical educationFamily medicinePsychologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explores the educational experience and professional practice of
 women who entered the dental profession in Ontario in the 1920s. During this
 period, dentists were educated in Toronto: initially, at a school affiliated with the
 University of Toronto, and after 1925, at the Faculty of Dentistry, University of
 Toronto. While few women entered the dental profession until recently, there was
 a notable influx of women into the profession in the early 1920s. This article
 reviews the factors that contributed to women’s involvement at this time, and
 provides an overview of their academic and social experiences in dental school.
 Professional records indicate that most, if not all, of these female dental students
 practised their profession after graduation, and many had very lengthy careers.
 The article discusses the significance of marriage patterns and the characteristics
 of women’s professional practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.588
Threshold uncertainty score0.960

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it