MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1961092202 · doi:10.1109/ecce.2015.7310252

An accurate deadbeat control method for grid-tied converter using weighted average current sensing

2015· article· en· W1961092202 on OpenAlexaff
Jinwei He, Yunwei Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)IslandingConvertersComputer scienceGridCurrent (fluid)CapacitorHarmonicController (irrigation)AC powerVoltageLine (geometry)Current sensorPower (physics)Electric power systemControl (management)EngineeringMathematicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To satisfy the requirement of operating DG units in both grid-tied and islanding microgrids, relatively large shunt capacitors are often selected for the output LCL filters of power converters. This modification can bring a few challenges, such as harmonic distortions and steady-state tracking errors, to the line current regulation during power converter grid-tied operation. In addition, the line current control problems can be more severe when the model-based one-step deadbeat current control scheme is used to reduce the computational load of DG unit controller and to enhance the dynamic current response. To overcome these limitations, a resonance dampened control method is developed utilizing the concept of the recently proposed weighted average current control with two current measurements. First, the weighted average current is accurately controlled via a modified deadbeat control scheme based on a virtual filter plant. To reduce the line current tracking errors caused by weighted average current approximation, a simple feed-forward term using existing grid voltage measurement is added to the line current reference of the proposed deadbeat control. Simulated and experimental results validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score0.730

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207