MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1961095301 · doi:10.1109/iecec.1990.747969

Excitation Of A Fluidyne Tuning Line

2005· article· en· W1961095301 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Thermodynamic Systems and Engines
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStirling enginePiston (optics)Heat engineWork (physics)Stirling cycleMechanical engineeringLine (geometry)Mixing (physics)Computer scienceExcitationMaterials scienceAutomotive engineeringEngineeringPhysicsElectrical engineeringOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fluidyne, or liquid piston Stirling engine, incorporates liquid columns as displacers and pistons in a heat engine type which can be used in conjunction with low-grade heat sources to provide useful work in the form of liquid pumped over a modest head. The liquid feedback type of fluidyne offers particular advantages including the absence of moving mechanical parts; this type of machine incorporates a liquid column to divert a small quantity of cycle work which is then used to re energise the displacer of the engine which must supply all of the pumping work of the engine. Previous research has demonstrated the import ance of correct design of the mixing of the liquid of the tuning line and the displacer. In this paper the results of an exDeriment are reported which demonstrate the response of the two liquid columns to tho varying system pressure which is both the consequence of engine operation as well as the means bv which the svstem is actuated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it