Building sustainable sport programs for Indigenous Youth: Perceived Strengths and Challenges of the PLAY Program
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Right to Play’s “Promoting Life-skills in Aboriginal Youth” (PLAY) program explores how to build sustainable sport programs for Indigenous youth. PLAY uses the transformative power of sport and play to educate and empower Aboriginal children to become leaders and active participants in their communities. However, there is currently a lack of evaluation in sport programming involving Aboriginal youth (Danish, Forneris, Hodge, & Heke, 2004). Thus, the University of Ottawa has collaborated with Right to Play to perform an evaluation of the PLAY program. The evaluation of the PLAY program assessed: (1) community engagement, (2) youth development, (3) stakeholder perceptions of the program to evaluate objective alignment, and (4) results related to the program’s success factors. This data was useful in enhancing sustainability and informing future evaluation practices. In particular, this study explored the perceptions and personal views of 10 PLAY staff members on the percieved strengths and challenges of the program. INTRODUCTION
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".