Follow-up of adult patients with repaired esophageal atresia: how, when, and for how long?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esophageal atresia (EA) is the most common congenital anomaly of the esophagus. With the progress of surgical and anesthetic techniques, the survival is now more than 90% and the majority of children survives and eventually reaches adulthood. However, even if the continuity of the esophagus is anatomically replaced by the surgery, there are some new pieces of evidence that suggest considerable long-term morbidity. In this paper, we will illustrate how symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux, dysphagia, and esophageal motility disturbances, as well as columnar epithelial metaplasia, are common in adults with repaired EA. The ideal follow-up for adult patients born with EA has not been clearly defined, and routine endoscopic assessment has not been widely advocated. It is well known that the patient's symptoms have a poor correlation with histological findings. However, routine follow-up may be expensive and time consuming. With the growing number of children reaching adulthood, it is now essential to know and understand the natural history of this condition to improve the management of these patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".