MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Polymorphism in Simyra albovenosa (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae)

2009· article· fr· W1961555934 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Pekka Vakkari

Bibliographic record

VenueHereditas · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsMaj ja Tor Nesslingin SäätiöHelsingin Yliopisto
KeywordsBiologyLepidoptera genitaliaNoctuidaeEpistasisPolymorphism (computer science)ZoologyBotanyEvolutionary biologyGeneticsGeneGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The genetics of the melanic forms of Simyra albovenosa (Goeze) were studied by means of laboratory crosses. The forms were classified for the frequency of dark scales on the intravenal regions of the forewing. The uniform black form and the patterned intermediate are controlled by separate loci, the former being completely dominant to pale and epistatic to intermediate, and the latter, partially dominant to pale. The intensity of the whitish to yellowish background colouration is affected by the developing strategy, non-diapausing moths being paler than diapausing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHereditasSame topicLepidoptera: Biology and TaxonomyFrench-language works237,207