MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1961723375 · doi:10.1080/14779757.2017.1330702

Emotion-focused therapy of depression

2017· article· en· W1961723375 on OpenAlexaff
Leslie S. Greenberg

Bibliographic record

VenuePerson-Centered & Experiential Psychotherapies · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSadnessPsychologyShameAbandonment (legal)FeelingPsychotherapistDepression (economics)EmpathyTherapeutic relationshipAutobiographical memoryArousalCognitive psychologyClinical psychologyAngerSocial psychologyRecall

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A review of emotion-focused therapy (EFT) of depression including a discussion of its evidence base is provided. EFT aims within an affectively attuned empathic relationship to access and transform habitual maladaptive emotional schematic memories that are seen as the source of the depression. These memories often involve feelings of the shame of worthlessness, anxious insecurity and the sadness of abandonment. Through the therapeutic process, adaptive emotions are accessed to transform maladaptive emotions and to organize the person for adaptive responses. This process of changing emotion with emotion is aided by the use of specific therapeutic techniques that help stimulate arousal of emotion and its processing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.694
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePerson-Centered & Experiential PsychotherapiesSame topicPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207