MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1961878559 · doi:10.1002/14356007.o23_o05

Rubber, 8. Synthesis by Polymer Modification

2011· other· en· W1961878559 on OpenAlexaff
M. Happ, John J. Duffy, G. J. Wilson, Stephen D. Pask, Hartmuth Buding, Andreas Ostrowicki

Bibliographic record

VenueUllmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry · 2011
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Nanocomposites and Properties
Canadian institutionsBayer (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduction (economics)Natural rubberPolymer sciencePolyethyleneNitrileChemistryNitrile rubberChemical engineeringOrganic chemistryEngineeringEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The article contains sections titled: 1. Halobutyl Rubber 1.1. Introduction 1.2. Properties, Grades, and Applications 1.3. Basic Chemistry and Production Process 1.3.1. Basic Chemistry 1.3.2. Production 1.4. Chemical Analysis 1.5. Storage and Transportation 1.6. Legal Aspects 1.7. Producers and Production Capacities 1.8. Toxicology and Occupational Health 1.9. New Commercial Development 2. Chloropolyethylene and Chlorosulfonyl Polyethylene 2.1. Chloropolyethylene 2.1.1. Properties, Grades, and Applications 2.1.2. Basic Chemistry and Production Processes 2.2. Chlorosulfonyl Polyethylene 2.2.1. Properties, Grades, and Applications 2.2.2. Basic Chemistry and Production Processes 2.3. Producers and Production Capacities 3. Hydrogenated Nitrile Rubber 3.1. Properties, Grades, and Applications 3.2. Basic Chemistry and Production Processes 3.3. Producers and Production Capacities 4. Polyphosphazenes 4.1. Properties, Grades, and Applications 4.1.1. Properties 4.1.2. Commercial Grades and Applications 4.2. Basic Chemistry and Production Processes 4.3. Producers and Markets

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUllmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial ChemistrySame topicPolymer Nanocomposites and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207