MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1962390163

일본의 인구구조 변화에 따른 소비시장 변화에 대한 고찰

2008· article· ko· W1962390163 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
변재웅, 최성백

Bibliographic record

Venue일본문화학보 · 2008
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemographic changeConsumption (sociology)PopulationPopulation growthAffect (linguistics)Developed countryDemographic economicsDemographyRest (music)Population projectionGeographyEconomicsPsychologySociologyMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many observers have noted that over the next several decades, large and unprecedented shifts will occur in the demographic make up of all of the major industrialized countries. And this demographic change will affect the pattern of consumption and its behaviour. The fraction of the population in Japan that is elderly and single family will be growing dramatically, while the fraction of the population made up of children will decline. Japan began the postwar period with a far lower fraction of elderly population than the rest of the G7, but it overtakes the US and Canada between 1990 and 1995, and the rest of the G7 in 2005. The overall rate of population growth in Japan will become negative. This change can be expected to have large economic effects, the Japanese consumption pattern and its behaviour per se. In this paper, we examine the effect of the Japanese demographic change on the consumption pattern and its behaviour, and found that the demographic change will affect the pattern of consumption behaviour over the last two decades. We expect that the future demographic change will affect the pattern of consumption and its related industries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue일본문화학보Same topicMigration, Aging, and Tourism StudiesFrench-language works237,207