Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans les textes relatifs à l’islam produits par le Concile, nous pouvons lire, par exemple dansNostra Ætate, que « L’Église regarde aussi avec estime les musulmans, qui adorent le Dieu Un, vivant et subsistant, miséricordieux et tout-puissant, Créateur du ciel et de la terre, qui a parlé aux hommes [...] ». Les textes de Vatican II semblent proposer une attitude à l’égard de l’islam qui rappelle celle de Louis Massignon (1883-1962) : ne retrouve-t-on pas dans les textes du Concile l’écho de la révolution copernicienne qu’opéra Massignon en islamologie ? Dans quelle mesure cet islamologue catholique a-t-il impulsé le renouveau du regard chrétien à l’égard de l’islam ? Cet article, grâce à une étude approfondie de l’oeuvre de Massignon, de sa vie et de sa correspondance, révèle les liens qui existaient entre ce grand islamologue et les protagonistes du Concile, au nombre desquels le Cardinal Montini (Paul VI). Il analyse ainsi la contribution de Massignon au renouvellement du regard porté par l’Église sur l’islam, afin d’évaluer son influence sur le Concile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".