MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1962707412

Evolución reciente de la catalogación

2004· article· es· W1962707412 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2004
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLibraries, Manuscripts, and Books
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCatalogingStandardizationLibrary scienceComputer scienceInformation retrievalWorld Wide Web
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En los últimos años la catalogación está siendo sometida a cambios profundos por efecto de la tecnología de la información. Logrados el consenso internacional sobre las entradas bibliográficas (Conferencia de París, 1961), la normalización de los elementos descriptivos (Reunión de Copenhague, 1969), la concreción de los fundamentos básicos de los registros bibliográficos (Conferencia de Toronto, 1997) y abierto un espacio para la actualización y mantenimiento de las AACR2 (Conferencia de Washington, 2000), en nuestros días se revisan los procedimientos y principios de la catalogación por los expertos como el más elaborado instrumento de búsqueda y recuperación de la información. Y de ello es prueba el nuevo valor dado al control de autoridad en catalogación (Conferencia de Florencia, 2003).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.384
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0160.007
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.417
GPT teacher head0.467
Teacher spread0.051 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it