Study on Dual-Track System of Chinese Land Ownership
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In China, there are two tracks in the system of land ownership which are respectfully adaptable for urban citizens and for rural farmers. The ownership of rural land belongs to the village whereas the ownership of urban land belongs to the state, the government, in a sense. Therefore, based on the double-track system the land in urban can be sold to anyone for use but the land in the village can only be sold to the villagers, that means, the identities of buyers must be restrained, which is absolutely unfair and unjust to Chinese people. Therefore we need to change the double-track system into unitary-track system, that means every citizen or farmer, whatever, so long as a Chinese would have the right to buy the land wherever is located in the rural area or in the urban area. Everyone in China has the right to buy or to sell the land you have occupied lawfully. Cancellation of the special track to farmer’s land, making all lands belong to the state, controlled and supervised by state special departments, is not just imperative, but also feasible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it