MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963044959 · doi:10.1002/cem.2636

Constrained kernelized partial least squares

2014· article· en· W1963044959 on OpenAlex
Siamak Salari Sharif, J.P. Reilly, John F. MacGregor

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemometrics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace and Expression Recognition
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsPartial least squares regressionNonlinear systemKernel (algebra)Latent variableNoise (video)Mathematical optimizationComputer scienceVariable (mathematics)MathematicsKernel methodAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMachine learningSupport vector machine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonlinear kernel methods have been widely used to deal with nonlinear problems in latent variable methods. However, in the presence of structured noise, these methods have reduced efficacy. We have previously introduced constrained latent variable methods that make use of any available additional knowledge about the structured noise. These methods improve performance by introducing additional constraints into the algorithm. In this paper, we build upon our previous work and introduce hard‐constrained and soft‐constrained nonlinear partial least squares methods using nonlinear kernels. The addition of nonlinear kernels reduces the effects of structured noise in nonlinear spaces and improves the regression performance between the input and response variables. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it