MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W196305148

"The Outlook for Old Age Is Not Hopeful" : The Struggle of Female Teachers over Pensions in Quebec 1880-1914

2013· article· en· W196305148 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Ruby Heap, Alison Prentice

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire sociale · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalaryPensionPolitical scienceState (computer science)PoliticsProtestantismSociologyHumanitiesGender studiesLawArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the struggle led by Quebec Protestant and Catholic women teachers' associations for a more just pension scheme from the late nineteenth century to the First World War. In Quebec, superannuation schemes for public school teachers dated back to the 1850s. In 1880, a compulsory, state-administered, pension plan for both male and female certified lay teachers was introduced. It discriminated seriously against women teachers, who constituted the majority of the lay teaching force; since the amount to be allocated was calculated on the basis of a teacher's average salary and total years of service, women teachers, who were paid considerably less than their male colleagues and also tended to have shorter careers, were to receive a much smaller pension. The present discussion explores the dynamics of the battles conducted by Quebec women teachers to eliminate these inequalities as well as the strategies and tactics they adopted to bring about change. It also sheds light on the importance of support received from other women's groups as well as on gender politics in teaching in turn-of-the-century Quebec. Cet article traite des luttes que les associations d’institutrices protestantes et catholiques du Quebec ont menees de la fin du dix-neuvieme siecle jusqu’a la Premiere Guerre mondiale pour obtenir un regime de pension plus equitable. Les enseignants et enseignantes du systeme scolaire public beneficiaient d’un tel regime depuis les annees 1850. En 1880, un regime obligatoire fut instaure a l’intention des institutrices et instituteurs laiques brevetes exercants dans les ecoles primaires publiques, regime qui etait nettement discriminatoire a l’endroit de la majorite du corps enseignant laique, c’est-a-dire les femmes. Puisque le calcul de la pension se basait sur le salaire moyen et le nombre total des annees de service, les institutrices, qui touchaient un salaire bien inferieur a celui de leurs collegues masculins et enseignaient generalement moins longtemps que ces derniers, recevaient a leur depart une somme derisoire. L’analyse qui suit explore les strategies et les tactiques que les institutrices utiliserent pour rectifier la situation. Elle eclaire aussi les relations entre les associations d’institutrices et les autres associations feminines ainsi que les rapports qui prevalaient au sein du corps enseignant quebecois au tournant du siecle entre les deux sexes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0170.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire socialeSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207