MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963179904 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.38

Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteric reflux with Deflux: a Canadian experience

2012· article· en· W1963179904 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Luis A. Guerra, Priya Khanna, M Levasseur, John Pike, Michael P. Leonard

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVesicoureteric refluxMedicineStingRefluxVoiding cystourethrogramVesicoureteral refluxEndoscopic treatmentSurgeryUreterLithotomy positionScarsEndoscopyInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Vesicoureteric reflux is a common problem encountered in urological practice. Traditionally, if medical management with low-dose antibiotic prophylaxis failed, the only alternative was ureteroneocystostomy. Recently, promising results with subureteric injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deflux) have renewed interest in the endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteric reflux (VUR). OBJECTIVE: We reviewed the outcome of the subtrigonal injection (STING) procedure with Deflux at a single pediatric hospital and included the rate of VUR resolution and complications. METHODS: An Institutional Review Board approved the retrospective review of all cases of STING performed with Deflux at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, from April 2003 to October 2005. We used voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) or radionuclide cystogram (RNC) for diagnosis of VUR. The most common indications for surgery were breakthrough infection, progression of renal scars and parental preference. A subureteral or intra-ureteral injection, at the 6 o'clock position, delivered the material to support the ureter and correct VUR. RESULTS: We reviewed the cases of 64 patients, 47 girls (73%) and 17 boys (27%), with a mean age of 6 years (range 1-17 yr) and a mean follow-up of 8 months (range 2-23 mo). A total of 26 patients (41%) had bilateral VUR and 38 (59%) had unilateral VUR (90 renal units were treated). Overall cure rate was 79.7% (51/64) per child and 74% (67/90) per renal unit. Among the 64 patients treated, 62.5% (40/64) were cured with a single injection, and a second and third injection raised the cure rate to 78% (50/64) and 79.7% (51/64), respectively. Contralateral low-grade de novo VUR was present in 7.9% (3/38) of the 38 unilateral cases. Postoperatively, de novo hydronephrosis developed in 3.3% (3/90) of the ureters, in 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic treatment of VUR with Deflux is a feasible outpatient procedure, requires minimal operating room time and is associated with low morbidity. In our study, it demonstrated a cure rate of 80% of patients and 74% of renal units. Dysfunctional voiding and neurogenic bladder (NB) do not seem to adversely affect results. STING should be considered for failed open reimplants, because it is much less morbid than redo reimplants. Further experience with the material and increased use of intraureteral injection may improve our cure rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association JournalSame topicPediatric Urology and Nephrology StudiesFrench-language works237,207