MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963295106 · doi:10.63997/jct.v25i3.106

Curriculum-in-the-Making

2009· article· en· W1963295106 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Curriculum Theorizing · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTeacher Education and Leadership Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumSociologyMathematics educationEpistemologyCurriculum theoryPedagogyCognitive scienceCurriculum developmentPsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Next Moment in the Field: The Internationalization of Curriculum Studies and Studying Abroad" focuses on what curriculum theorizing might bring to the phenomenon of study in another country.As the reader will see, the contributions are creative and eclectic.Topics include women within global time and space; Japanese secondary school students' international cross-cultural experiences in the U.S.; novice Canadian teachers' experiences with intercultural curriculum in Japan and Hong Kong; the interrelation of race, class, and gender with U.S. preservice teachers' experiences studying in Honduras; U.S. imperialism and imposition embedded in the regulations and rules that accompany overseas teaching; international teaching experiences for early career professionals; subjectivities, relationality, and knowledge construction within international contexts; and the autobiography of an Indian woman studying abroad.The diversity of articles in this special issue is clearly its strength.This does not mean, however, there are not connections and interrelations.At least two themes surface in our analysis: Essays address the mutually constitutive relations of curriculum studies and study abroad and situate the intricacies of studying abroad by way of personal, political, economic, and social analyses and concepts.Accordingly, the articles within this special issue complicate and extend thoughts about internationalization and studying abroad and draw on concepts and theories inside as well as outside the study abroad and curriculum studies literatures.Taken as a whole, these essays redefine and expand what it means to study abroad.Key to this special issue, questions abound as to what to make of the internationalization of curriculum studies.How we conceive of this contested site-where language, culture, and power are insinuated with each other in ways that are not fully determinable-has implications for how we practice curriculum and pedagogy in the midst of the globalizing efforts of our colleges and universities.How we theorize and practice studying abroad within our educational programs necessarily will be varied, but there is a clear need to address issues of breakdowns, ambivalences, and even the failure of things to go as planned, in addition to the all too common focus on successes.Accordingly, the "complicated conversations" found within this special issue stand in

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.335
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it