MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W196333043 · doi:10.33137/rr.v40i4.9040

Shakespeare's Joan and the Great Whore of Babylon

2004· article· fr· W196333043 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Patrick Ryan

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesPortraitArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inconfortables avec le portrait injurieux que fait Shakespeare de Jeanne d'Arc, les critiques tendent à considérer 1 Henry 6 comme un exemple de défaut d’expression relevant de la période d'apprentissage de l'auteur dramatique. Néanmoins, le public élisabéthain a reçu cette pièce de théâtre d'histoire avec un extraordinaire enthousiasme, conduisant les critiques féministes à étudier la Jeanne d’Arc de Shakespeare en tant que portrait remarquablement mobilisateur de la femme forte aux prises avec le patriarcat des débuts de l'époque moderne. Cet article examine l'utilisation dans 1 Henry 6 de l'idéologie apocalyptique protestante, en particulier de ses composantes misogynes. Plus précisément, Shakespeare présente Jeanne d'Arc, la sainte guerrière française, comme un avatar de la Grande Prostituée de Babylone, figure allégorique du Livre des Révélations, et, pour les protestants élisabéthains, figure de l'Église catholique romaine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.564

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207