Phases Formed in Al-Doped Ni[sub 1/3]Mn[sub 1/3]Co[sub 1/3](OH)[sub 2] Prepared by Coprecipitation: Formation of Layered Double Hydroxide
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The coprecipitation process, using either mixed nitrate or sulfate solutions, to produce Al-doped has been studied in detail. Using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), it has been determined that charge-compensating or ions accompany the incorporated ions into the structure to form layered double hydroxides (LDHs). The phases formed were determined for in and . For , two phase mixtures between (, Mn, and Co) and the LDH phase with were formed. For aluminum contents greater than , XRD and TGA experiments suggest that the excess Al is present as and that the product is a mixture of or and , where M represents the mixture of Ni, Mn, and Co. Alternatively, the data can also be explained assuming that samples with are single phase . TGA experiments show that the in the -containing LDH is eliminated at lower temperature than the in the -containing LDH. Thus coprecipitations using nitrates may be preferred in situations where excellent cation mixing is desired in the production of Al-doped .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it