Intermittent intensive physiotherapy in children with cerebral palsy: a pilot study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aims of the study were: (1) to determine the feasibility of a rehabilitation program combining intensive therapy periods (4 times/week for 4 weeks) with periods without therapy (8 weeks) over a 6-month period in severely impaired children with cerebral palsy (CP); and (2) to measure changes in gross motor function after intensive therapy periods (immediate effects) and rest periods (retention). A convenient sample included five children (two females, three males; mean age 22.6 months [SD 9.9]) with severe forms of CP with impairment of four limbs and trunk (GMFCS levels IV and V). A multiple-baseline design was used. Changes in motor performance were assessed by a blind evaluator using the Gross Motor Function Measure. Visual and statistical analyses followed. Level of compliance during intensive therapy was 93.1%. Children received a mean of 30 treatments over the 24 weeks of the experimental phase compared with the 48 treatments they would have received routinely. Increases in GMFM scores (mean 9.2%; range 3 to 15%) were significant in three children (p<0.05) and all participants maintained their motor performance during the two 8-week rest periods. Results showed that four treatments per week over a 4-week period were well tolerated when separated by rest periods. The intermittent program led to improvements in motor function that were maintained over the rest periods. Results underline the need to reconsider the organization of physical rehabilitation programs. A regime that is intensive enough without being tiring and one that provides practice conditions for consolidating motor skills learned during the intensive therapy period may best optimize motor training.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".