MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sistema de informação como ferramenta de cálculo e gestão de custos em laboratórios de análises clínicas

2006· article· pt· W1963511515 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial · 2006
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Health in Brazil
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O laboratório clínico, munido de um sistema de informática que costumeiramente operacionaliza suas rotinas e atua como um importante arquivo de dados e informações, pode utilizar-se deste como uma ferramenta que seria de grande utilidade para o cálculo e a gestão do custo real dos exames e demais procedimentos que realiza. Os sistemas implementados no momento, entretanto, segundo os dados obtidos junto a nove laboratórios situados na cidade de São Paulo, são tidos por seus usuários como inadequados a esta finalidade. As opiniões a respeito foram as mesmas, independentemente do tempo em que o sistema encontra-se em operação, de sua procedência, do porte do laboratório, do tipo de atendimento que pratica, de sua situação econômico-financeira, de seu grau de automação, da formação profissional dos gestores e dos recursos que têm disponíveis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it