MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963527584 · doi:10.1002/lapl.200510087

A method of carrier-envelope phase control for few-cycle laser pulses

2005· article· en· W1963527584 on OpenAlexfundno aff
E. Hasović, D. B. Milošević, W. Becker

Bibliographic record

VenueLaser Physics Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und ForschungFederalno Ministarstvo Obrazovanja i Nauke
KeywordsCarrier-envelope phasePhase (matter)Superposition principlePulse (music)LaserPhysicsEnvelope (radar)Carrier signalElectronOpticsAtomic physicsMaterials scienceTelecommunicationsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The shape of the field of a few-cycle laser pulse strongly depends on the carrier-envelope phase. For a circularly polarized few-cycle pulse, this phase is correlated with a direction in space. Superposition of two counterrotating circularly polarized few-cycle pulses yields a linearly polarized pulse. High-energy electrons, generated through above-threshold ionization by such a combination of pulses, are emitted in a direction correlated with the carrier-envelope phase. Based on these facts, we propose two schemes for direct measurement and control of the carrier-envelope phase and the phase slip of a pulse train.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLaser Physics LettersSame topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207