TRAUMATIC LOADING OF THE BRYAN CERVICAL DISC PROSTHESIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Bryan disc prosthesis (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN) relies on a precise fit between the device and the vertebral endplates to provide immediate stability after cervical arthroplasty. The safety of the cervical arthroplasty in the setting of trauma is unknown. We compare the segmental strength of the normal cervical spine and the cervical spine after single-level arthroplasty. METHODS: Fifteen cadaveric cervical spines with arthroplasty placed at the C5-C6 level were compared with 16 intact cadaveric controls. A pure moment was applied to induce flexion, extension, or axial rotation until the segment failed. RESULTS: The prosthesis provided 63, 45, and 69% of the strength of a normal spine during flexion, extension, and rotation, respectively. There were no cases of prosthesis expulsion. CONCLUSION: After insertion of the Bryan disc, the remaining ligamentous tissues provide adequate acute stability to the spine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".