High-quality and homogeneous <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> plants from a simple and inexpensive method of hydroponic cultivation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A methodology is presented for the hydroponic cultivation of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. that is simple and inexpensive to construct from easily obtainable and reusable materials. High-quality and uniform plant material, free of algae and disease, are consistently produced through all life-stages. Minor modifications to previous protocols that reduce cost and labour include the use of small food-storage containers with snap-on lids, aluminum foil wrap to cover the containers to occlude light, commercial hydroponic fertilizer as nutrient solution, and clipped 1.5 mL microfuge tubes as plug holders. Seed is germinated on nutrient agar plates, instead of directly on rockwool plugs; after the seedlings have grown to the six-leaf stage, they are removed from the plates and the roots are enclosed within rockwool plugs that have been cut longitudinally. Subsequent seedling growth is very uniform and the elimination of oversowing and subsequent thinning results in a dramatic reduction in seed and seedling wastage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".